Table 3From “Dynamic capabilities are routines, not magic”
Why does possession of dynamic capabilities fail to guarantee commercial success?
Table 3Why does possession of dynamic capabilities fail to guarantee commercial success?
| Layer | What to record |
|---|---|
| Capability claim | Which process is supposed to create change? |
| Context claim | Under which market and operating conditions? |
| Process evidence | What does the process actually do and repeat? |
| Outcome evidence | Which declared result changed, and compared with what? |
| Learning evidence | What did the organization revise after feedback? |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Source: Table from this essay. Sources and interpretation are given in the article.

From the essay
Growth that compounds
Dynamic capabilities are routines, not magic
Dynamic capabilities are identifiable processes, not a synonym for success: test routines, path dependence, and market velocity first.
Read the essayThis exhibit belongs to an essay: the numbers live here, the argument lives there.
Cite or embed
Related exhibits

Table 1Table
Why must dynamic capabilities begin with concrete organizational processes?
Dynamic capabilities are routines, not magic

Table 1Table
Dynamic capability depends on market velocity
Dynamic capabilities are routines, not magic

Table 1Table
Why does an account score fail to execute commercial budget allocation?
Customer selection is a resource-allocation decision
Contact
Bring the question you're working on.
Research, a guest lecture, or a commercial question.