← Home

The test behind the work.

Alongside the commercial work, I am pursuing a DBA at EM Normandie on what happens to sales and marketing after a cross-border acquisition. It is the same question under a stricter standard: test what is true before building on it.

The method

Evidence, traced end to end.

Systematic literature review Mapping what’s already known Qualitative expert interviews Evidence straight from the field Coding and synthesis Structured, Gioia-style analysis

Under way: fieldwork openA stage of the method

The three stages of the method, as this page names them. The one under way follows the fieldwork calendar: Pilots Q3/Q4 2026 · main wave 2027.

Why a doctorate

The part that keeps it honest.

The operating work produces patterns: things that look true across deals, teams and markets. The doctorate is where I test them. A claim I would make in a boardroom has to stand before a committee, against the literature and the evidence.

The field is cross-border M&A and the integration of sales and marketing: the operational day after a merger, when two commercial organisations are supposed to become one. A material share of deal value is won or lost there.

The work is in progress, and the findings stay in the lab until they are tested and published. What’s on this page is the standard I hold the work to.

Opinion is cheap. Research is where the ideas have to earn it.

The doctorate

The academic half, in brief.

A practitioner doctorate run in parallel with commercial work, with evidence doing the deciding.

Programme
Doctorate in Business Administration (DBA)
Institution
EM Normandie Business School
Triple-accredited: EQUIS · AACSB · AMBA.
Field
Cross-border M&A and the integration of sales and marketing
Milestone
Extended Research Proposal: 19/20
The conceptual and literature foundation, graded.
Status
In progress
Enrolled since 2025; dissertation phase ahead.
Research ID
ORCID (opens in a new tab)
0009-0008-2450-5106 · where the published work will appear.

The method

How a question becomes evidence

Qualitative and interview-led: designed to surface what actually happens inside organisations.

  1. Step 1 of 4: Foundation

    Systematic literature review

    Establishing what the field already knows and, more usefully, where it does not.

  2. Step 2 of 4: Fieldwork

    Qualitative expert interviews

    Primary evidence from people who have lived cross-border integration first-hand.

  3. Step 3 of 4: Elicitation

    Critical Incident Technique

    Anchoring the analysis in specific, real turning points.

  4. Step 4 of 4: Analysis

    Gioia methodology

    A disciplined coding approach that keeps interpretation traceable from raw data to theory.

The study

Fieldwork open

The study needs practitioners who were there.

Doctoral research into what actually happens in the commercial organisation in the first year after a cross-border acquisition. Fifteen to twenty-five conversations, including cases where the integration fell short of expectations.

What the study asks

Fieldwork, not business development. Taking part creates no commercial relationship.

The conversation
One pseudonymised conversation, 45 to 75 minutes, with nothing to prepare.
Who
People who were at the sales and marketing interface in the first year after a cross-border acquisition: on either side of it.
Protected
Pseudonymised at transcription, the key kept apart, and withdrawal at any point.
When
Pilots Q3/Q4 2026 · main wave 2027