Pricing & Monetization
The number, and what it signalled.
Willingness-to-pay, pricing models and tiers, and the funnel constraints that quietly capped win rates. One of the fastest levers in the work, and the one least often examined.
What changed
Most teams anchored price to cost or a competitor. The work that changed the decision started with what the outcome was worth to the buyer and designed the model so the price carried part of the argument. It also meant being honest when price was fine and something else was doing the damage: price is the most common suspect and often the wrong one.
The diagnostic
Price is the most common suspect and often the wrong one. Ask why the last ten deals were lost and count how many answers mention the number. If it is fewer than half, the pricing problem is probably positioning or qualification wearing a price complaint.
The method
Four moves, in order.
Finding willingness-to-pay
By segment: what the outcome was worth, not what it cost to produce.
Designing the model
Models and tiers, so the right buyer self-selected and the number itself signalled the value.
Diagnosing the funnel
Where win rate actually leaked, and whether price was the cause or the scapegoat.
Testing the number
Small, reversible moves with a real read on elasticity, in a business where a permanent change is very hard to walk back.
The question that remained
A price is judged before it is paid, and the judging happens somewhere no dashboard reaches. What a buyer concludes from a number, before they have used anything, is where this went next.
Further reading
- Your customer base is priced exactly once: or never Self-built brands and customer lists may not enter your own balance sheet. They are named and priced when the company changes hands: often not even then.
- The price increase is judged before it is paid. The fairness rules license the cost-justified raise; the one exit test crowned another story. What is measured, what splits, what your contract says.
- The discount outlives the deal it was meant to close Buyers benchmark the last price paid; sellers anchor on their last concession; the quarter end manufactures both. What is measured, and what is folklore.
- A flat rate buys your customer’s worst month. Flat pricing for software rested on two conditions, and inference cost broke one. The buyers who most want a flat rate are the ones with the biggest tail.
- Pricing is a positioning decision. Willingness to pay is not decided at the price page. It is built from what the buyer compares you against: so the set, not the number, is the lever.
- Your pricing page publishes which buyers you won’t separate. Publish or hide is not the decision anyone is making. Half of pricing pages do both at once, and the choice underneath has been measured exactly once.
Explore another area
Bring the question you're working on.
Research, a guest lecture, or a commercial question.
A short note is enough to give it shape.
Get in touch →