← Every exhibit

Figure 1From “Programmatic M&A: the claim that outlived its test”

The strongest number, and its label

The decade-level split in the nearest academic test runs in the claim's direction: as untested medians the paper itself files as a non-reported analysis.

Cite Embed

Figure 1The strongest number, and its label

A bar chart of the decade-level split in Laamanen and Keil 2008. Frequent acquirers with ten or more deals, 173 firms: median excess return plus 12.6 percent per year. Less frequent acquirers with four to nine deals, 438 firms: minus 3.9 percent per year. Both bars are marked because the split is the point, and it is descriptive medians from a non-reported analysis with no significance test for it in the paper.-505101512.6Frequent acquirers (10+ deals, 173 firms)-3.9Less frequent (4–9 deals, 438 firms)Median excess return per year (%)

Source: Laamanen & Keil (2008), robustness note: median excess market returns per year over 10–13 years, 611 U.S. serial acquirers (1990–99); the paper prints the buckets as 'over 10' (173 firms) and '4–9' (438 firms), which partition the full 611. Its prose calls the split significant; the analysis is non-reported and no test statistic for it appears in the article. Descriptive medians; the authors disclaim causality.

PNG4:3, 1600 × 1200, with the title, the source line and the attribution set in the image isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02.png

Source and evidence

Each line names a claim related to this exhibit, its source, and how it was checked.

  • A LK08-C1 Laamanen and Keil studied 5,518 acquisitions by 611 active U.S. acquirers from 1990 to 1999 using three-year excess market returnsLaamanen & Keil (2008), Strategic Management Journal 29(6)
  • A LK08-C2 Over the 10 to 13 year horizon, 173 frequent acquirers had median excess returns of 12.6% per year versus -3.9% for 438 less frequent acquirers; the split was descriptive and non-reportedLaamanen & Keil (2008), robustness note

Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.

Cite or embed

APA 7

Isoglu, S. (2026). The strongest number, and its label [Figure]. isoglu.com. https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02/

BibTeX
@misc{isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02,
  author = {Isoglu, Sinan},
  title = {{The strongest number, and its label}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Figure 1, isoglu.com},
  url = {https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02/},
  note = {From the essay {Programmatic M\&A: the claim that outlived its test}}
}
Embed this exhibit

Copy this HTML to use the PNG exhibit on your site with its source line and a link back to the exhibit page.

<figure>
  <a href="https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02/">
    <img src="https://isoglu.com/social/isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02.png" alt="Figure 1: The strongest number, and its label" width="3200" height="2400">
  </a>
  <figcaption>Figure 1: The strongest number, and its label. Source: Laamanen &amp; Keil (2008), robustness note: median excess market returns per year over 10–13 years, 611 U.S. serial acquirers (1990–99); the paper prints the buckets as &#39;over 10&#39; (173 firms) and &#39;4–9&#39; (438 firms), which partition the full 611. Its prose calls the split significant; the analysis is non-reported and no test statistic for it appears in the article. Descriptive medians; the authors disclaim causality. <a href="https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-the-claim-that-outlived-its-test-fig02/">View exhibit</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>