← Every exhibit

Figure Figure 2 Go-to-market & pricing

The revenue-management control record

Name the resource, horizon, state, control, outcome, and evidence boundary before choosing a heuristic.

A four-column worksheet with five blank rows. The columns ask for resource and horizon, requests and state, control and authority, and outcome and test. The worksheet is a blank author framework, not observed company data.RESOURCE AND HORIZONWhat is scarce, and when doesthe allocation problem end orchange?REQUESTS AND STATEWhich requests compete, andwhat is known about remainingcapacity, time, and demand?CONTROL AND AUTHORITYCan price, acceptance,allocation, or timing change?Who may change it?OUTCOME AND TESTWhich outcome is protected,and what result woulddisconfirm the policy?Five rows are blank reader inputs. The worksheet separates source assumptions, local observations, and the decisionhypothesis before implementation.
Vector SVG Cite Embed

Reference & Evidence

Source: Author's worksheet grounded in the constrained-capacity and control distinctions in Maglaras and Meissner (2006). Blank fields are reader inputs; no performance result or implementation recommendation is supplied.

Each line is a claim from the register this journal publishes against, resolved from the register at build time.

  • A The model, verbatim: "a firm that owns a fixed capacity of a resource that is consumed in the production or delivery of multiple products" maglaras-meissner-2006-dynamic-pricing-revenue-management · MM06-C1
  • A Two variants, not one: "we consider two well studied variants of this problem": price-setting under market power, and capacity control at fixed prices maglaras-meissner-2006-dynamic-pricing-revenue-management · MM06-C2
  • A The reduction is the contribution: both problems reduce to a formulation "in which the firm controls the aggregate rate at which all products jointly consume resource capacity" maglaras-meissner-2006-dynamic-pricing-revenue-management · MM06-C3
  • A The three policies are the paper's own, and so is the limit on the strongest one: it proposes "a static pricing heuristic, (ii) a static pricing heuris"tic applied with a capacity allocation policy, and a resolving heuristic that reevaluates the fluid policy, of which "we show that “resolving” the fluid heuristic achieves asymptotically optimal performance" under fluid scaling, which is an asymptotic result and not a claim about any single market maglaras-meissner-2006-dynamic-pricing-revenue-management · MM06-C4
  • A The heuristics are fluid-scale asymptotically optimal only where potential demand and capacity grow proportionally large maglaras-meissner-2006-dynamic-pricing-revenue-management · MM06-C5
  • A The numerical section compares policies on specified model instances, and its results do not establish a portable commercial effect maglaras-meissner-2006-dynamic-pricing-revenue-management · MM06-C6

Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.

Related exhibits