Table 3From “Retention should be ranked by profit, not churn alone”
How can marketing teams construct an auditable profit-ranked retention scorecard?
Table 3How can marketing teams construct an auditable profit-ranked retention scorecard?
| Review field | Required question |
|---|---|
| Intervention | What exactly is being offered, changed, or withheld? |
| Incrementality | Compared with what would have happened without the intervention? |
| Economics | Which revenue, cost, and cash-flow items enter the calculation? |
| Capacity | How many contacts, offers, or service actions can be delivered? |
| Validation | What outcome and horizon will tell the team whether the ranking worked? |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Source: Table from this essay. Sources and interpretation are given in the article.

From the essay
Growth that compounds
Retention should be ranked by profit, not churn alone
High churn risk is not customer value: rank retention by incremental effect, intervention cost, postcampaign cash flow, and campaign size.
Read the essayThis exhibit belongs to an essay: the numbers live here, the argument lives there.
Cite or embed
Related exhibits

Table 1Table
The profit-first retention ranking card
Retention should be ranked by profit, not churn alone

Table 1Table
Why is statistical churn probability an insufficient basis for customer retention spend?
Retention should be ranked by profit, not churn alone

Table 2Table
Activation rate vs retention rate: which metric answers which question?
What is activation rate? The first value event must be observable
Contact
Bring the question you're working on.
Research, a guest lecture, or a commercial question.