The Two Views of Intangible Assets
One underlying evidence base produces two distinct views. Neither is merely an abridged version of the other.
| Dimension | The Operating View (Steering) | The External View (Transaction / Diligence) |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Reader | Process Owner, Commercial Executive | External Counterparty (Buyer, Lender, Auditor) |
| Core Question | What operational action do we take next? | What is the verifiable quality and risk of this asset? |
| Granularity | Process-level, driver-specific, identifiable | Aggregate, comparable, standardized |
| Controllability | High (direct operational levers) | Low to Medium (outcome valuation & risk bounds) |
| Cadence | Weekly, monthly, continuous | Deal-episodic, annual |
| Standard | Predictive utility & operational validity | Materiality, auditability, documentation |
| Failure Mode | Vanity scorecard without a decision owner | Unread narrative denominated in no consuming process |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Reference & Evidence
Source: Design synthesis based on Liu & Wang (2012) and empirical findings in Nielsen et al. (2017), BMWi (2013), and § 13 UG 2002. The operational framework is the author’s own.
Related exhibits
-
From translation version to comparison sentence
From the essay Measurement invariance before comparing English and German scores
-
The synthetic claim-to-evidence audit
From the essay What is claim entailment? Does the source support the sentence?
-
The synthetic lineage reconstruction table
From the essay What is data lineage? The transformations behind a result