← Every exhibit
What a territory carries
Before comparing territories, separate the work objects that a map usually hides. The table is a reader-run measurement frame, not a benchmark.
| Work object | Question for the assignment | What the held research contributes | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Account potential | What demand or opportunity is assigned? | Analytical territory models begin with smaller control units and potential estimates. | A potential estimate is not realized sales. |
| Information work | How much time is needed to learn, qualify, and update the accounts? | Information gathering can compete directly with selling time. | More information work is not automatically waste. |
| Travel and service | What time is consumed by distance, visits, support, and local coverage? | Territory design is linked to structural appropriateness and organizational outcomes in survey work. | Satisfaction does not establish causality. |
| Selling effort | Which actions receive the remaining capacity? | Effort allocation and territory formation can be modeled together. | No model supplies a universal call or visit quota. |
| Performance evidence | Which behaviour and outcome are being judged? | Research distinguishes behavioural performance, outcome performance, and organizational effectiveness. | One outcome cannot validate every workload assumption. |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Reference & Evidence
Source: Author's synthesis of Beswick and Cravens (1977), Darmon (2002), Horsky and Nelson (1996), and Piercy, Cravens, and Morgan (1999). The rows are measurement prompts, not a validated territory score.
Related exhibits
-
Conceptual commitment and redirectability by route
From the essay Market-entry mode trades control for learning and reversibility
-
The cross-market price bridge
From the essay A global price is not one price
-
The measurement, and the traps it must survive
From the essay The integration plan spends what the deal bought.