Table 1From “A channel needs governance before it needs another partner”
Why is a partner list not an effective channel design?
Table 1Why is a partner list not an effective channel design?
| Channel object | Question |
|---|---|
| Reach | Which customer, geography, segment, or use case becomes accessible? |
| Activity | Who creates demand, sells, implements, services, and learns? |
| Power | Which participant can influence decisions, standards, access, or resources? |
| Monitoring | Which behavior, outcome, and information can each firm observe? |
| Coordination | Which handoffs, rules, incentives, and data keep activities aligned? |
| Conflict | Which goals, territories, prices, or responsibilities can pull the channel apart? |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Source: Table from this essay. Sources and interpretation are given in the article.

From the essay
Revenue operations & AI
A channel needs governance before it needs another partner
A channel does not need another partner by default: first define power, monitoring, coordination, conflict, and the management question.
Read the essayThis exhibit belongs to an essay: the numbers live here, the argument lives there.
Cite or embed
Related exhibits

Table 1Table
The channel-governance-before-expansion card
A channel needs governance before it needs another partner

Table 3Table
Interfirm monitoring deserves a design
A channel needs governance before it needs another partner

Table 4Table
The unresolved questions are the work
A channel needs governance before it needs another partner
Contact
Bring the question you're working on.
Research, a guest lecture, or a commercial question.