The price elasticity commercial decision matrix
Map demand elasticity regimes against optimal commercial strategy, margin implications, and reference-price risks.
| Elasticity regime | Numerical range | Impact of price increase | Impact of discount | Optimal commercial governance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highly inelastic | $0 \le \lvert\epsilon\rvert < 0.5$ | Revenue and profit surge; volume drop is negligible | Revenue and profit plunge; fails to stimulate volume | Execute disciplined price increases; eliminate unearned concessions |
| Moderately inelastic | $0.5 \le \lvert\epsilon\rvert < 1.0$ | Revenue expands; profit rises if marginal costs are non-negative | Revenue falls; incremental volume cannot offset unit price dilution | Maintain price discipline; package value-added services rather than discounting |
| Unit elastic | $\lvert\epsilon\rvert = 1.0$ | Revenue approximately flat; profit depends on cost structure | Revenue approximately flat; profit falls if variable delivery costs are positive | Hold price steady; optimize internal production and fulfillment efficiency |
| Moderately elastic | $1.0 < \lvert\epsilon\rvert \le 2.0$ | Revenue drops; profit impact depends on marginal cost structure | Revenue expands; profit rises only if contribution margin ratio is sufficiently high | Evaluate targeted promotions; establish strict contribution recovery milestones |
| Highly elastic | $\lvert\epsilon\rvert > 2.0$ | Severe volume and revenue collapse; buyers switch to alternatives | Significant volume expansion; viable only where variable cost structure permits | Focus on differentiation, switching costs, and unbundling to escape price wars |
Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.
Reference & Evidence
Source: Author's pricing governance framework grounded in empirical elasticity and reference-price research from Simon (2015), Homburg et al. (2005), Bruno et al. (2012), and Zhang et al. (2014).
Each line is a claim from the register this journal publishes against, resolved from the register at build time.
- A Three findings, verbatim from the PDF (the extract warns it is mangled): "reference price effects exist on quantity purchased and on the transaction pricing outcome in business to business market transactions", "business customers react asymmetrically to price increases and price decreases", and "salespeople have their own reference prices that affect the transaction price" bruno-che-dutta-2012-reference-price-b2b ·
BCD12-C1 - A The two drivers, in the authors' words: reactions to price increases "are strongly driven by two factors: the magnitude of the price increase and the perceived fair"ness of the motive for it, and satisfaction moderates the magnitude effect homburg-hoyer-koschate-2005-price-increase-reactions ·
HHK05-C1 - A Two latent states, named in the paper: "a “vigilant” state that is characterized by heightened price sensitivity and a cautious approach to ordering and a “relaxed” state with purchase behaviors that are consistent with high relational trust", and "the seller's pricing decisions can transition buyers between these two states". One industrial-consumables retailer, longitudinal transactions zhang-netzer-ansari-2014-dynamic-targeted-pricing ·
ZNA14-C1
Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.
Related exhibits
-
The synthetic price-corridor ranges
From the essay What is a price corridor? A defensible range before a point price
-
The dynamic-price control map
From the essay Dynamic pricing needs a trigger, constraint, and explanation
-
The two-sided reference record
From the essay Pricing is a positioning decision.