Figure 1From “Pricing is a positioning decision.”
Almost nobody goes looking for a price
Monthly search volume for the category term itself, against the searches that explicitly ask what it costs.
Figure 1Almost nobody goes looking for a price
Source: Author's analysis of DataForSEO Google Ads search volume, 12-month average to June 2026, pulled 25 July 2026. Google Ads reports volume in rounded bands, so ratios are approximate; near-duplicate keywords are counted once.

Source and evidence
Each line names a claim related to this exhibit, its source, and how it was checked.
- A DFS-WTP-C1 The bare category term outruns price-shaped search by at least 58:1 in every pair measuredSinan Isoglu (2026), First-party pull, DataForSEO Google Ads Search Volume endpoint
- A DFS-WTP-C2 US category to price-shaped search ratios: CRM 635:1, ERP 450:1, project management 794:1Sinan Isoglu (2026), First-party pull, DataForSEO Google Ads Search Volume endpoint
- A DFS-WTP-C3 German category to price-shaped search ratios: CRM 330:1, ERP 58:1, project management 160:1Sinan Isoglu (2026), First-party pull, DataForSEO Google Ads Search Volume endpoint
Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.
From the essay
Pricing & revenue architecture
Pricing is a positioning decision.
Willingness to pay is not decided at the price page. It is built from what the buyer compares you against: so the set, not the number, is the lever.
Read the essayThis exhibit belongs to an essay: the numbers live here, the argument lives there.
Cite or embed
Contact
Bring the question you're working on.
Research, a guest lecture, or a commercial question.


