Table Table 3 From the research bench 1 September 2026

Why is ongoing operational governance an intrinsic component of hybrid capability claims?

Prompt	Why it belongs in the construct boundary
What can the person inspect?	Transparency determines whether the machine contribution is challengeable
What can the person override?	Control determines whether human judgement remains meaningful
Who owns the decision?	Accountability prevents the machine label from becoming a responsibility gap
What is rewarded?	Incentives can change whether disagreement and correction are possible

Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.

Cite Embed

Reference & Evidence

Source: Table from this essay. Sources and interpretation are given in the article.

From the essay

Hybrid intelligence needs a boundary between capability and outcome

Hybrid intelligence names complementary human and machine capability, not proof of better performance: define the construct before measuring the outcome.

This exhibit belongs to an essay: the numbers live here, the argument lives there.

Read the essay →

Reuse & Citation

Cite this exhibit

APA 7

Isoglu, S. (2026). Why is ongoing operational governance an intrinsic component of hybrid capability claims? [Table]. isoglu.com. https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-hybrid-intelligence-needs-a-boundary-between-capability-and-outcome-fig03/

BibTeX

@misc{isoglu-2026-hybrid-intelligence-needs-a-boundary-between-capability-and-outcome-fig03,
  author = {Isoglu, Sinan},
  title = {{Why is ongoing operational governance an intrinsic component of hybrid capability claims?}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Table 3, isoglu.com},
  url = {https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-hybrid-intelligence-needs-a-boundary-between-capability-and-outcome-fig03/},
  note = {From the essay {Hybrid intelligence needs a boundary between capability and outcome}}
}

Embed this exhibit

Copy this HTML to use the PNG exhibit on your site with its source line and a link back to the exhibit page.

<figure>
  <a href="https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-hybrid-intelligence-needs-a-boundary-between-capability-and-outcome-fig03/">
    <img src="https://isoglu.com/social/isoglu-2026-hybrid-intelligence-needs-a-boundary-between-capability-and-outcome-fig03.png" alt="Table 3: Why is ongoing operational governance an intrinsic component of hybrid capability claims?" width="3200" height="2400">
  </a>
  <figcaption>Table 3: Why is ongoing operational governance an intrinsic component of hybrid capability claims?. Source: Table from this essay. Sources and interpretation are given in the article.. <a href="https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-hybrid-intelligence-needs-a-boundary-between-capability-and-outcome-fig03/">View exhibit</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>

Related exhibits

Table Figure 1

The hybrid-intelligence construct boundary

From the essay Hybrid intelligence needs a boundary between capability and outcome
Table Table 1

Why is hybrid intelligence a descriptive label rather than a validated scientific construct?

From the essay Hybrid intelligence needs a boundary between capability and outcome
Table Figure 1

The incrementality causal measurement hierarchy

From the essay What is incrementality?

Why is ongoing operational governance an intrinsic component of hybrid capability claims?

Related exhibits

The hybrid-intelligence construct boundary

Why is hybrid intelligence a descriptive label rather than a validated scientific construct?

The incrementality causal measurement hierarchy