One hundred twenty-one citations, zero primary sources
Twelve runs, 121 citation slots, not one primary source among them. The marked row cited the most and sourced the origin no better: volume is not provenance.
Reference & Evidence
Source: The pair's replication package: responses.jsonl and the coding sheet, Q1 cell, twelve counted runs (per-run slots 3/2/2, 5/6/5, 10/12/18, 19/20/19; the German run excluded), recomputed against the shipped package 2026-08-19. Every run's source class coded tertiary: none produced a primary source.
Each line is a claim from the register this journal publishes against, resolved from the register at build time.
- A On the 5x question, twelve counted runs produced 121 citation slots (ChatGPT 7, Claude 16, Gemini 40, Perplexity 58) and zero primary sources dataset-retrieval-audit-2026-07: registered 2026-08-19 (D-B165 pattern), recomputed against the shipped package that day ·
RAUD26-C2
Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.
Related exhibits
-
Nineteen of thirty-six, and where the errors route
From the essay A vendor page supplied one tested source path for the 5x retention rule
-
The chain, and what is actually found at each link
From the essay A vendor page supplied one tested source path for the 5x retention rule
-
The synthetic claim-to-evidence audit
From the essay What is claim entailment? Does the source support the sentence?