← Every exhibit

Figure 1From “What is a nudge?”

Average effect by mechanism, in nudge units and in published trials

In the nudge units, only choice design averaged more than 3 points. In the published trials, every mechanism averaged more than 5.

Cite Embed

Figure 1Average effect by mechanism, in nudge units and in published trials

Dot chart from DellaVigna and Linos 2022, Table I: average treatment effect in percentage points of take-up by behavioural mechanism, nudge units first and published trials second. Simplification and information 1.19 and 16.34. Personal motivation 1.77 and 9.59. Reminders and planning prompts 2.54 and 5.02. Social cues 0.87 and 13.81. Framing and formatting 1.38 and 13.53. Choice design 7.01 and 8.85. All nudges 1.39 and 8.68.Nudge units (241 nudges, 126 trials)Published trials (74 nudges, 26 trials)05101520Simplification and informationPersonal motivationReminders and planning promptsSocial cuesFraming and formattingChoice designAll nudgesAverage treatment effect, percentage points

Source: DellaVigna and Linos (2022), p. 92, Table I (continued), Mechanism rows and Total: average treatment effect in percentage points of take-up; Nudge Units 241 nudges in 126 trials, Academic Journals 74 nudges in 26 trials. The mechanism categories are not mutually exclusive, so one nudge can count in several rows; default changes are excluded from both samples.

PNG4:3, 1600 × 1200, with the title, the source line and the attribution set in the image isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01.png

Source and evidence

Each line names a claim related to this exhibit, its source, and how it was checked.

  • A DELLAVIGNA22-C7 Nudges coded by policy area, communication channel and behavioural mechanism; six mechanisms at the units (simplification of a letter or notice; personal motivation, such as personalizing or loss aversion; implementation intentions or planning prompts; social cues or norms; framing or formatting; active choice or salience), filed in Table I as simplification and information, personal motivation, reminders and planning prompts, social cues, framing and formatting, choice design; mechanism frequencies not mutually exclusive; 1.5 mechanisms per arm in the published sample against 2.2 at the units; units' contact mostly by email, letter or postcard, in-person contact common in the published sample; examples: a simplified, personalized re-enrolment email with loss framing and clear action steps, enrolment in AutoPay and e-bill, payment of utility fines and sewer bills. Table I (p. 92, read from the page image), average treatment effect in percentage points, Nudge Units then Academic Journals, nudges (trials) in brackets: simplification and information 1.19 (141, 73) and 16.34 (4, 2); personal motivation 1.77 (138, 76) and 9.59 (24, 9); reminders and planning prompts 2.54 (76, 49) and 5.02 (26, 11); social cues 0.87 (88, 58) and 13.81 (16, 7); framing and formatting 1.38 (77, 47) and 13.53 (24, 8); choice design 7.01 (15, 12) and 8.85 (15, 9); total 1.39 (241, 126) and 8.68 (74, 26); no standard errors printed (pp. 86, 89, 90, 92, 97): "We categorize each nudge by its policy area, communication channel, and behavioral mechanisms"; "simplification of a letter or notice"; "drawing on personal motivation such as personalizing the communication or using loss aversion to motivate action"; "using implementation intentions or planning prompts"; "exploiting social cues or building social norms into the communication"; "adjusting framing or formatting of existing communication"; "people towards an active choice or making some choices more salient"; "Frequencies for Medium and Mechanism are not mutually exclusive"; "an average of 1.5, compared to an average of 2.2 in Nudge Unit trials"; "The medium of communication with the treatment group tends to be through email, letter, or postcard in the Nudge Units sample, as opposed to in-person interactions, which are common in the Academic Journals sample."; "the treatment group received a simplified, personalized email with loss framing and clear action steps"; "encouraging utilities customers to enroll in AutoPay and e-bill"; "nudging people to pay fines after being delinquent on a utility payment"; "Among the positive outliers are treatments with reminders for a sewer bill payment and emails prompting online AutoPay registration for city bills."DellaVigna & Linos (2022), Econometrica 90(1), 81-116

Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.

Cite or embed

APA 7

Isoglu, S. (2026). Average effect by mechanism, in nudge units and in published trials [Figure]. isoglu.com. https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01/

BibTeX
@misc{isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01,
  author = {Isoglu, Sinan},
  title = {{Average effect by mechanism, in nudge units and in published trials}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {Figure 1, isoglu.com},
  url = {https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01/},
  note = {From the essay {What is a nudge?}}
}
Embed this exhibit

Copy this HTML to use the PNG exhibit on your site with its source line and a link back to the exhibit page.

<figure>
  <a href="https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01/">
    <img src="https://isoglu.com/social/isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01.png" alt="Figure 1: Average effect by mechanism, in nudge units and in published trials" width="3200" height="2400">
  </a>
  <figcaption>Figure 1: Average effect by mechanism, in nudge units and in published trials. Source: DellaVigna and Linos (2022), p. 92, Table I (continued), Mechanism rows and Total: average treatment effect in percentage points of take-up; Nudge Units 241 nudges in 126 trials, Academic Journals 74 nudges in 26 trials. The mechanism categories are not mutually exclusive, so one nudge can count in several rows; default changes are excluded from both samples. <a href="https://isoglu.com/insights/exhibits/isoglu-2026-what-is-a-nudge-fig01/">View exhibit</a>.</figcaption>
</figure>