← Every exhibit

Table Figure 1 Revenue operations & AI

Customer churn intervention cost and decision matrix

Proactive retention outreach carries severe unit costs for false alarms. Sleeping dogs and stable accounts must be shielded from unneeded discounting.

Classification stateRealityInterventionCost profileCustomer responseNet outcome
True Positive (Saveable)Real risk; solvable blocker.Discovery and support fix.High CSM labor hours.Resolves blocker and renews.Positive ROI: Contract saved.
True Positive (Lost Cause)Irreversible risk (bankruptcy).Discounts and escalations.High labor and concessions.Churns regardless of offer.Negative ROI: Concessions lost.
False Positive (Stable)Healthy account; seasonal dip.Preemptive discount offer.Unneeded margin loss.Accepts unneeded discount.Negative ROI: Margin destroyed.
False Positive (Sleeping Dog)Inactive; inertia account.Outreach citing low usage.CSM outreach hours.Cancels after wake-up call.Severe Negative ROI: Caused churn.

Swipe or scroll horizontally if the table is wider than your screen.

Cite Embed

Reference & Evidence

Source: Author's commercial retention model grounded in Ascarza, Iyengar and Schleicher (2016). All figures and costs are synthetic decision benchmarks.

Each line is a claim from the register this journal publishes against, resolved from the register at build time.

  • A The backfire, verbatim: encouraging customers to switch to cost-minimising plans can "increase rather than decrease customer churn" Ascarza, Iyengar & Schleicher. (2016) · AIS16-C1
  • A The proposed mechanisms are the authors' own: the campaign increased churn "by lowering customers" inertia to switch plans and by increasing the salience of past-usage patterns Ascarza, Iyengar & Schleicher. (2016) · AIS16-C2

Grades: A, verified against the printed page of the primary source · B, primary source, text layer only · C, authoritative secondary · D, reported.