Abbruchregel für Evidenzreviews

Jede Zeile nennt eine Aussage zu dieser Abbildung, ihre Quelle und die Art ihrer Prüfung.

• B EISEN89-C1 The paper describes a process, not a result: "This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case stud"ies, from specifying the research questions to reaching closureEisenhardt. (1989). Building theories from case study research
• B EISEN89-C2 Sampling is theoretical rather than statistical: "Such research relies on theo""retical sampling (i.e., cases are chosen for theo"retical reasons, including polar typesEisenhardt. (1989). Building theories from case study research
• B EISEN89-C4 Within-case first, then across: the framework names "case and cross-case analyses, and the role of" existing literature as separate stepsEisenhardt. (1989). Building theories from case study research
• B EISEN89-C5 Closure is a judgement, and the table says so: "Theoretical saturation when possible Ends process when marginal improvement becomes small"Eisenhardt. (1989). Building theories from case study research
• B EISEN89-C6 Case-based theory should be evaluated for evidence fit, testability, logical coherence, rival explanations, and bounded noveltyEisenhardt. (1989). Building theories from case study research
• B GIOIA13-C1 The two orders are the paper's own device: "a systematic presentation of both a" first-"order analysis (i.e., an analysis using informant-centric terms and codes)" and a second-order one, distilled into "aggregate dimensions"Gioia, Corley & Hamilton. (2013)
• B GIOIA13-C2 And the authors refuse the template reading: "we see it as a flexible orientation toward qualitative, inductive research that is open to innovation", rather than a cookbookGioia, Corley & Hamilton. (2013)
• A BMJ22-C1 The review's own count: "we identify 73 articles" about the sales-marketing interface, published 1990 through 2021Biemans, Malshe & Johnson. (2022)
• A BMJ22-C2 The coding scheme, in the review's words: "structural linkages refer to the horizontal platforms or interaction" channels established for interdepartmental activity, alongside role linkages, interactions and perceptionsBiemans, Malshe & Johnson. (2022)
• B GUEST06-C2 The 12-interview result is conditional and not a universal rule, and the authors bound it themselves: saturation occurred within the first twelve interviews, "at least based on the codebook we devel"oped, in a study of relatively homogeneous respondentsGuest, Bunce & Johnson. (2006)
• B HENN17-C2 Code saturation and meaning saturation answer different questions, and the paper reports different sample sizes for each: more interviews "were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues", and the authors present the finding as conditions rather than a number, since "We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation"Hennink, Kaiser & Marconi. (2017)
• B MAL16-C2 Higher information power can support a smaller sample, but the concept is an appraisal and not a formula: "Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant" for the study, the lower the number of participants neededMalterud, Siersma & Guassora. (2016)
• B B12-C1 An evidence review can close when its search boundary, inclusion logic, extraction structure, rival check, and incremental-learning judgement are visibleAuthor framework grounded in Eisenhardt, Gioia, Hennink, and Biemans et al.
• B B12-C2 Saturation is a purpose- and design-dependent judgement, not a universal number of sources or interviewsAuthor framework grounded in Guest, Hennink, Hagaman, and Malterud

Prüfgrade: A, gegen die gedruckte Seite der Primärquelle geprüft · B, Primärquelle, nur Textebene · C, belastbare Sekundärquelle · D, berichtet.

Diese Abbildung gehört zu einem Essay: Die Zahlen stehen hier, das Argument dort.